Sunday July 13th, 2008

If You Don’t Stand For Something, …

by GM Roper ~ July 13th, 2008 7:29 pm

… You’ll fall for anything.  And so it goes in the political arena today with the liberal end of the spectrum pontificating with pie-in-the-sky ideals on poverty, abortion, transfers of wealth, taxing only the rich and other “inartful” dodges of truth!  The wife of the presumptive Democrat nominee Michelle Obama asks today’s college students to go into teaching, nursing, social work and forgo the riches that come with sayyyy a $320 K a year job with the University of Chicago’s Hospital.  Of course, if you do become a teacher or nurse or social worker, the opportunities to buy $600.00 earrings doesn’t come around very often.  In a country where the Democrats have blocked energy exploration and the building of nuclear reactors for decades and even Teddy Kennedy has blocked bills for years and damn sure isn’t going to allow windmills in his back yard we are whining about the cost of … you guessed it, energy!  When Phil Gramm says that we MUST do something positive and that we are NOT in a recession and the facts on the ground say that we are in a slow-down, that there are problems, and we gotta quit the whining, what happens, but a bunch of folk including John McCain friggin WHINE about it. 

Two days ago I regretfully closed down my blog “GM’s Corner” but 4 years of battling was enough and a change is needed.  A time to recharge my batteries.  While I decide what to do with http://gmroper.mu.nu, I’ll continue to be here from time to time to support Jim and Doug’s baby Reclaim Conservatism.   But I can tell you this folks, most citizens of this great country don’t stand for anything unless they are slapped in the face by something like Pearl Harbor or 9/11.  We, collectively, are a bunch of whiners for sure and we are falling for the snake oil salesman like no body’s business.  If we don’t begin to reclaim conservatism, imagine what it will be like for your child and grand child and for damn sure you won’t be around to see it, but for your great grand child and your great-great grandchild.

My first grandchild will be born at the end of this year, I don’t want my grand-baby to grow up in a second rate socialist country.  Join me.  Join Jim and Doug, fight back, and fight back hard.  When some one says raise taxes, remind them that lower taxes have increased government receipts, not the other way around.  When someone says universal health care, remind them that the Soviet Union had that.  When someone says “for the little guy” remind them that 4 of the top five wealthiest Senators are Democrats.  When some one says “culture of corruption” remind them of the current crop running the House and the Senate.

You better get off your collective butts folk and get working, if the liberals take over, there may not be enough to reclaim. 

 

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Monday July 7th, 2008

Wesley Clark, Fired General

by GM Roper ~ July 7th, 2008 7:12 pm

 

Earlier General Wesley Clark, retired and former candidate for President made some remarks about who might be qualified for president.  Of course, everybody knows that Clark was being a surrogate for Obama and Obama’s attempts to lessen the allure of John McCain’s military service since Obama has none.  But Clark seems to have stepped over the line when he said “I don’t think getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president.” That raises an interesting question:  What would Clark have said about the military and other exploits of other presidents?

 

Wesley Clark on George Washington:  “I don’t think crossing the Delaware River standing up in a boat in the middle of winter qualifies Washington to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on John Adams:  “I don’t think being a diplomat in France and Holland during our bloody revolution qualifies Adams to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on Thomas Jefferson:  “I don’t think writing the Declaration of Independence qualifies Jefferson to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on Abraham Lincoln:  “I don’t think splitting logs in Illinois qualifies Lincoln to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on Ulysses Grant:  “I don’t think accepting Lee’s Sword at Appomattox qualifies Grant to be president.” 

 

Wesley Clark on Teddy Roosevelt:  “I don’t think riding up San Juan Hill with a bunch of washed out cowboys qualifies Roosevelt to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on Franklin Roosevelt:  “I don’t think getting polio and riding around in a wheel chair qualifies Roosevelt to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on Ike Eisenhower:  “I don’t think sitting on a battleship while our brave soldiers invaded Normandy qualifies Eisenhower to be president.”

 

Wesley Clark on John Kennedy:  “I don’t think letting a Japanese Destroyer ram your PT boat, sinking it, qualifies Kennedy to be president.” 

 

Clark seems to have thought that having no substantial experience qualifies Obama to be president, and certainly he thought that being the fired military commander of NATO qualified him to be president. 

Cross posted at GM’s Corner

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Friday July 4th, 2008

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

by Jim Lynch ~ July 4th, 2008 9:01 pm

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

This is what we must reclaim. ~ Jim

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Sunday June 22nd, 2008

The Content Of His Character

by GM Roper ~ June 22nd, 2008 11:42 pm

In August of 1963, a muggy, sweltering day, a Senior at Mt. Vernon High School stood by the reflecting pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument.  The student was only one of many many thousands that day, gathered in the hopes that some day there would be peace between white and black Americans.  That student was me, and I was less than a month from my 17th Birthday. 

As a 6th grader I witnessed the hostility and hatred of my fellow whites when Central High School in Little Rock was integrated.  I cringed when called “nigger-lover” by some of my school mates who had never gone to school with blacks or ever associated with them or maybe even never knew one.  You see, I grew up in the Army, my dad was a career officer and the Military had been integrated by President Truman in 1948.  Integration was all I knew and I had no problems with it.

But, I digress, I stood with the thousands and listened to the tenor voice of Martin Luther King.  As his voice rang out, this phrase in particular struck me, as it still does 45 years later:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

Judged by the content of their character.  What a concept that is, when at the time, so many were judged by the color of their skin, the region they came from or the god that they worshiped, should not be judged by these things, but by their character.

And so we have arrived at today, having been through tumult, asassinations, riots and slow but positive growth, to a point where African Americans are elected by solid majorities to office in the south, where the bastions of hatred have been ground down, but unfortunately, where there are also those who would keep the races apart (Jessie, Al, are you reading this?) and those who depend on anger and hostility to keep their names in light.

We have had African Americans as Secretary of State, as Generals and Admirals, as Presidents of large Corporations, and now, a black American is running for President of the United States and it looks like he will get the nomination from the Democrat Party.  Yet, in my opinion, the content of their character is still important.

Barack Obama proclaimed he would pull out of Iraq immediately, and now he says he won’t.  He said that he would be using public financing for his race, and now he won’t.  He has said that NAFTA was anathema, and now all of a sudden, it isn’t.  He has attended a church where some of the most vile racist comments made from a pulpit have rung forth, and now he says that wasn’t the Jeremiah Wright he knew.  He has associated with, and benefited from associations with an admitted but unconvicted urban terrorist.  He has manipulated opposition off of the ballot in order to win elections.  And he has said, in spite of no one making this association BUT him, that the opposition will play the race card. 

The content of his character has been weighed.

And has been found wanting!

xposted at GM’s Corner

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

The AP: Sky is Falling; only Obama can save us

by directorblue ~ June 22nd, 2008 7:27 pm

Two interesting facts regarding the Associated Press: (a) the AP is now charging fees to excerpt even small snippets of articles*; and (b) it has pegged the needle on the bias-o-meter with two of today’s national articles.

Where’s our can-do psyche? (”Everything Seemingly Is Spinning out of Control”) by Alan Fram and Eileen Putman; the pair report — in Carter-esque style — that American confidence has eroded… the economy, the weather and gas prices have all spun “out of control”. The only thing that can help: the party in the White House must change.

McCain recovering from bad streak of campaign missteps by David Espo (AP). Say, I follow politics pretty closely, but I haven’t heard of any of these so-called “missteps”.

Obama has grand plans for spending by Jim Rutenberg of the New York Times. Granted, it’s not the AP, but virtually a seamless fit with the theme… and the grandiose report doesn’t exactly jibe with reality. May was one of Obama’s worst fundraising months.

At Newsbusters, Tom Blumer noticed the ’sky is falling’ meme as well. Graphic: New York Post.

Update: Harley Davidson answers the doom-and-gloomers.

Update II: The AP: a veritable free public relations arm for Hugo Chavez.

* TechCrunch: Our new policy on AP stories: they’re banned.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Tuesday June 10th, 2008

Obama’s shindig in St. Louis

by stix1972 ~ June 10th, 2008 3:39 pm

Well, last night after work I went to the Downtown Renaissance Hotel inSt. Louis with some College Republicans.  I may not be the greatest fan of McCain, but Iam totally against the Obamassiah. So we waited there to see if we can get a glimpse of our next Messiah, but he arrived and entered at another entrance.  It was nice to see some of the young Republicans out there, it gives me hope that our younger generation is not totally lost on the “Progressive” Socialism that the Democrats are talking about.  All in all it was a pretty fun time, and mostly friendlywith the Obama crowd.  The only real confrontation was between some Obama supporters and a couple that had asign against abortion that showed what an aborted fetus looked like.  But other than that we just had the McCain supporters on one side of Washington Ave, and the Obama supporters on the other.  I am sure there are pictures and some video out there, all the local channels were there and local newspapers were also, if I find any I will post them here also.

….

Monday night outside the Renaissance, a couple dozen McCain allies, most of them area members of the College Republicans, underscored that theme. The group waved pro-McCain signs and posters declaring “Change We Can’t Afford.” Nearby, a smaller number of anti-abortion protesters nearby waved a giant placard showing aborted fetuses and other signs decrying Obama’s support of abortion rights.

Obama, for his part, made no mention of the protesters. What his victory for the nomination signaled, he said, was that many Americans were embracing his approach to politics and public policy.

“I believe in the politics of building people up, not tearing people down,” he said.—-STLtoday

Yes,he is off to a good start with all the Hillary supporters going to McCain and alienating those bitter people.

 

Also posted at Grizzly Groundswell and Stix Blog

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Monday June 9th, 2008

Consciously Conservative!

by GM Roper ~ June 9th, 2008 7:31 pm

In 1962 and 63, my awareness of politics went overnight from “yawn” to “what the hell does congress think they are doing.  The overnight cause was a single reading in one fell swoop of Barry Goldwater’s Conscience of a Conservative, a fairly short book given to me by a High School buddy along with a copy of Ian Fleming’s “Dr. No.”  Both books had an influence, one a 4 year old spy novel that titillated a young man’s imagination, the other, a political statement that more than 45 years later still reverberates in the political halls.  Well, it did until the Republican party lost it’s way!

 In mid-May of this year, my friend Doug Ross published GOP 2.0, Rebooting the Republican Party with a number of priorities that need to become our “ironclad” signature:

STRENGTHEN NATIONAL DEFENSE - increase the size, capability and efficiency of our Armed Forces, bringing back our defense spending to historical levels as percentage of GDP.

GAIN ENERGY INDEPENDENCE - open up ANWR and the OCS to exploration; aggressively pursue nuclear energy and green technologies; and incent private industry to aggressively pursue clean, renewable energy sources.

SECURE THE BORDERS - build physical barriers immediately as a precursor to an overarching, sensible immigration policy. If the boat’s sinking, you plug the holes first.

DEATH TO EARMARKS - zero tolerance for earmarks.

DEATH TO CORRUPTION - zero tolerance for corruption.

ENGLISH AS NATIONAL LANGUAGE - national unity requires a national language. That language is English.

IMPLEMENT FLAT TAX OR FAIR TAX - simplify the tax system by eradicating a tax code gone mad.

REDUCE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT - provide “whistle-blower-style” awards for reducing the size of government and task the IRS (which will no longer have to worry about enforcing the tax code) with achieving the reduction goals on an annual basis

SPUR HEALTHCARE COMPETITION - Address health-care deficiencies - with competitive, free-market solutions, not Government largesse.

ADDRESS ENTITLEMENTS - engage a bipartisan consortium to create a multi-million dollar competition to incent teams from private industry and academia to create solutions for our social security and Medicare liabilities.

This should not be a platform. It should be a promise — an ironclad commitment — to voters

If you ask most voters (well, except those smitten with The Obamamessiah and maybe a lot of them too) you will find that the majority of Americans are concerned with exactly those subjects (if asked in an honest straightforward manner.) 

Unfortunately, those are not questions that will be asked, in fact, most “news” sources are more than happy to trumpet the liberal/progressive line.  And therein lies the rub.  The MSM, being profoundly liberal for the most part has no truck with conservative positions and the Republican party as currently constituted has abandoned conservatism for Democrat Lite, hewing themselves to big programs, big spending, big pork-barral projects and a refusal to stand up for conservative principles.  In fact, with a very few exceptions, the majority of Republicans have thrown off their conservative cloaks, cloaks they were elected under, and donned the regalia of typical tax and spend Democrats.

If conservatism is to become resurgent, we must start from the ground up.  Look for and find local persons willing to run on a conservative platform and willing to tell the truth to the American people.  Look for and support those that are willing to sign on to Republican Party 2.0 and accept nothing less from your elected representatives.  Send them e-mails, letters, and postcards.  Tell them that you are fed up, and you aren’t going to take it anymore. 

You have nothing to lose but your country!

Cross posted at GM’s Corner

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Wednesday June 4th, 2008

Who is Obama???

by stix1972 ~ June 4th, 2008 10:26 am

Now that Obama has won the nomination to be the Democrat Presidnetial Candidate,do wer eally know who he is???  Well, I know who he is, but does the country know who he is???  He is running as the uniter, which is very hard to understand, since he is the most partisan in his votes in the Senate.  He is also aligned with the Unions and other far left wing groups such as Moron.org.   So how is he going to bring people together, he will not even bring the Democrat Party together???   Many pundits and experts in election think that he has the upper edgeon winning the Presidency.   I think he has already sunk, with Hillary’s supporters heading over to McCain, and when his associations and votes in Illinois are seen by the country, he will have a hard time to convince the public that heis the one to take the helm of our country.  I could be wrong, but the country is not that far left, the War in Iraq is going better since the “Surge”, and we might finally build another refinery so gas prices might fall.  So what isis that will attract people toObama. Well, the MSM will have a good showing and help Obama along, but the MSM is losing groundt the New Media,since people can look up what theMSM is saying and do not take their word for the truth anymore.

 

Today the WSJ has  got a good article on The Obama we don’t know:

Yet govern how and to what end? This is the Obama Americans don’t know. For all of his inspiring rhetoric about bipartisanship, his voting record is among the most partisan in the Senate. His policy agenda is conventionally liberal across the board – more so than Hillary Clinton’s, and more so than that of any Democratic nominee since 1968.

We can’t find a single issue on which Mr. Obama has broken with his party’s left-wing interest groups. Early on he gave a bow to merit pay for teachers, but that quickly sank beneath the waves of new money he wants to spend on the same broken public schools. He takes the Teamsters line against free trade, to the point of unilaterally rewriting Nafta. He wants to raise taxes even above the levels of the Clinton era, including a huge increase in the payroll tax. Perhaps now Mr. Obama will tack to the center, but somehow he will have to explain why the “change” he’s proposing isn’t merely more of the same, circa 1965.—WSJ

 

Cross Posted at Grizzly Groudswell and Stix Blog

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Tuesday June 3rd, 2008

Back To Basics

by Jim Lynch ~ June 3rd, 2008 8:02 pm

Ed Morrissey wrote Time to return to the first principles of conservatism? several days ago. He makes a great point about the basics of conservatism.

What is the first principle of conservatism? Limited government. Our founders understood this, which is why they tightly constrained the jurisdiction of the federal government in the Constitution. Henry David Thoreau famously wrote “That government is best which governs least”, and that encapsulates what has been the overarching philosophy of conservatism as applied to governance. Furthermore, it exists in opposition to and as a counterbalance for the competing philosophy of socialism, which postulates that government improves as it governs more.

Sadly, limited government is probably the principle from which we’ve strayed the furthest. And the one we most need to reclaim.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum

Saturday May 31st, 2008

Shamed Dogan

by stix1972 ~ May 31st, 2008 8:15 pm

Shamed_dogan_banner_red

Cross posted at Grizzly Groundswell and Stix Blog

This last Thursday I had the great privalege to meet a great candidate for Missouri’s 88th district.  It was a fun time and I met some pretty cool people at a Young Republicans Happy Hour.  And Shamed was there.  He is a good guy and I think would be a great addiction to the Missouri House.  It is too bad I live in Illinois and can not vote for him.  He is very smart, conservative and will be a great representative.   He has worked in Washington, D.C. , with Jim Talent, so he knows how the political game is played.  So I endorse him, and if any of you are in his district vote for him this fall.

 

Shamed Dogan

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
Sphere: Related Content

Related posts

Discuss this post in the Forum