The Content Of His Character

In August of 1963, a muggy, sweltering day, a Senior at Mt. Vernon High School stood by the reflecting pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument.  The student was only one of many many thousands that day, gathered in the hopes that some day there would be peace between white and black Americans.  That student was me, and I was less than a month from my 17th Birthday. 

As a 6th grader I witnessed the hostility and hatred of my fellow whites when Central High School in Little Rock was integrated.  I cringed when called “nigger-lover” by some of my school mates who had never gone to school with blacks or ever associated with them or maybe even never knew one.  You see, I grew up in the Army, my dad was a career officer and the Military had been integrated by President Truman in 1948.  Integration was all I knew and I had no problems with it.

But, I digress, I stood with the thousands and listened to the tenor voice of Martin Luther King.  As his voice rang out, this phrase in particular struck me, as it still does 45 years later:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

Judged by the content of their character.  What a concept that is, when at the time, so many were judged by the color of their skin, the region they came from or the god that they worshiped, should not be judged by these things, but by their character.

And so we have arrived at today, having been through tumult, asassinations, riots and slow but positive growth, to a point where African Americans are elected by solid majorities to office in the south, where the bastions of hatred have been ground down, but unfortunately, where there are also those who would keep the races apart (Jessie, Al, are you reading this?) and those who depend on anger and hostility to keep their names in light.

We have had African Americans as Secretary of State, as Generals and Admirals, as Presidents of large Corporations, and now, a black American is running for President of the United States and it looks like he will get the nomination from the Democrat Party.  Yet, in my opinion, the content of their character is still important.

Barack Obama proclaimed he would pull out of Iraq immediately, and now he says he won’t.  He said that he would be using public financing for his race, and now he won’t.  He has said that NAFTA was anathema, and now all of a sudden, it isn’t.  He has attended a church where some of the most vile racist comments made from a pulpit have rung forth, and now he says that wasn’t the Jeremiah Wright he knew.  He has associated with, and benefited from associations with an admitted but unconvicted urban terrorist.  He has manipulated opposition off of the ballot in order to win elections.  And he has said, in spite of no one making this association BUT him, that the opposition will play the race card. 

The content of his character has been weighed.

And has been found wanting!

xposted at GM’s Corner

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

The AP: Sky is Falling; only Obama can save us

Two interesting facts regarding the Associated Press: (a) the AP is now charging fees to excerpt even small snippets of articles*; and (b) it has pegged the needle on the bias-o-meter with two of today’s national articles.

Where’s our can-do psyche? (“Everything Seemingly Is Spinning out of Control”) by Alan Fram and Eileen Putman; the pair report — in Carter-esque style — that American confidence has eroded… the economy, the weather and gas prices have all spun “out of control”. The only thing that can help: the party in the White House must change.

McCain recovering from bad streak of campaign missteps by David Espo (AP). Say, I follow politics pretty closely, but I haven’t heard of any of these so-called “missteps”.

Obama has grand plans for spending by Jim Rutenberg of the New York Times. Granted, it’s not the AP, but virtually a seamless fit with the theme… and the grandiose report doesn’t exactly jibe with reality. May was one of Obama’s worst fundraising months.

At Newsbusters, Tom Blumer noticed the ’sky is falling’ meme as well. Graphic: New York Post.

Update: Harley Davidson answers the doom-and-gloomers.

Update II: The AP: a veritable free public relations arm for Hugo Chavez.

* TechCrunch: Our new policy on AP stories: they’re banned.

Sphere: Related Content

 

Obama’s shindig in St. Louis

Well, last night after work I went to the Downtown Renaissance Hotel inSt. Louis with some College Republicans.  I may not be the greatest fan of McCain, but Iam totally against the Obamassiah. So we waited there to see if we can get a glimpse of our next Messiah, but he arrived and entered at another entrance.  It was nice to see some of the young Republicans out there, it gives me hope that our younger generation is not totally lost on the “Progressive” Socialism that the Democrats are talking about.  All in all it was a pretty fun time, and mostly friendlywith the Obama crowd.  The only real confrontation was between some Obama supporters and a couple that had asign against abortion that showed what an aborted fetus looked like.  But other than that we just had the McCain supporters on one side of Washington Ave, and the Obama supporters on the other.  I am sure there are pictures and some video out there, all the local channels were there and local newspapers were also, if I find any I will post them here also.

….

Monday night outside the Renaissance, a couple dozen McCain allies, most of them area members of the College Republicans, underscored that theme. The group waved pro-McCain signs and posters declaring “Change We Can’t Afford.” Nearby, a smaller number of anti-abortion protesters nearby waved a giant placard showing aborted fetuses and other signs decrying Obama’s support of abortion rights.

Obama, for his part, made no mention of the protesters. What his victory for the nomination signaled, he said, was that many Americans were embracing his approach to politics and public policy.

“I believe in the politics of building people up, not tearing people down,” he said.—-STLtoday

Yes,he is off to a good start with all the Hillary supporters going to McCain and alienating those bitter people.

 

Also posted at Grizzly Groundswell and Stix Blog

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

In 1962 and 63, my awareness of politics went overnight from “yawn” to “what the hell does congress think they are doing.  The overnight cause was a single reading in one fell swoop of Barry Goldwater’s Conscience of a Conservative, a fairly short book given to me by a High School buddy along with a copy of Ian Fleming’s “Dr. No.”  Both books had an influence, one a 4 year old spy novel that titillated a young man’s imagination, the other, a political statement that more than 45 years later still reverberates in the political halls.  Well, it did until the Republican party lost it’s way!

 In mid-May of this year, my friend Doug Ross published GOP 2.0, Rebooting the Republican Party with a number of priorities that need to become our “ironclad” signature:

STRENGTHEN NATIONAL DEFENSE – increase the size, capability and efficiency of our Armed Forces, bringing back our defense spending to historical levels as percentage of GDP.

GAIN ENERGY INDEPENDENCE – open up ANWR and the OCS to exploration; aggressively pursue nuclear energy and green technologies; and incent private industry to aggressively pursue clean, renewable energy sources.

SECURE THE BORDERS – build physical barriers immediately as a precursor to an overarching, sensible immigration policy. If the boat’s sinking, you plug the holes first.

DEATH TO EARMARKS – zero tolerance for earmarks.

DEATH TO CORRUPTION – zero tolerance for corruption.

ENGLISH AS NATIONAL LANGUAGE – national unity requires a national language. That language is English.

IMPLEMENT FLAT TAX OR FAIR TAX – simplify the tax system by eradicating a tax code gone mad.

REDUCE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT – provide “whistle-blower-style” awards for reducing the size of government and task the IRS (which will no longer have to worry about enforcing the tax code) with achieving the reduction goals on an annual basis

SPUR HEALTHCARE COMPETITION – Address health-care deficiencies – with competitive, free-market solutions, not Government largesse.

ADDRESS ENTITLEMENTS – engage a bipartisan consortium to create a multi-million dollar competition to incent teams from private industry and academia to create solutions for our social security and Medicare liabilities.

This should not be a platform. It should be a promise — an ironclad commitment — to voters

If you ask most voters (well, except those smitten with The Obamamessiah and maybe a lot of them too) you will find that the majority of Americans are concerned with exactly those subjects (if asked in an honest straightforward manner.) 

Unfortunately, those are not questions that will be asked, in fact, most “news” sources are more than happy to trumpet the liberal/progressive line.  And therein lies the rub.  The MSM, being profoundly liberal for the most part has no truck with conservative positions and the Republican party as currently constituted has abandoned conservatism for Democrat Lite, hewing themselves to big programs, big spending, big pork-barral projects and a refusal to stand up for conservative principles.  In fact, with a very few exceptions, the majority of Republicans have thrown off their conservative cloaks, cloaks they were elected under, and donned the regalia of typical tax and spend Democrats.

If conservatism is to become resurgent, we must start from the ground up.  Look for and find local persons willing to run on a conservative platform and willing to tell the truth to the American people.  Look for and support those that are willing to sign on to Republican Party 2.0 and accept nothing less from your elected representatives.  Send them e-mails, letters, and postcards.  Tell them that you are fed up, and you aren’t going to take it anymore. 

You have nothing to lose but your country!

Cross posted at GM’s Corner

Sphere: Related Content

Who is Obama???

Now that Obama has won the nomination to be the Democrat Presidnetial Candidate,do wer eally know who he is???  Well, I know who he is, but does the country know who he is???  He is running as the uniter, which is very hard to understand, since he is the most partisan in his votes in the Senate.  He is also aligned with the Unions and other far left wing groups such as Moron.org.   So how is he going to bring people together, he will not even bring the Democrat Party together???   Many pundits and experts in election think that he has the upper edgeon winning the Presidency.   I think he has already sunk, with Hillary’s supporters heading over to McCain, and when his associations and votes in Illinois are seen by the country, he will have a hard time to convince the public that heis the one to take the helm of our country.  I could be wrong, but the country is not that far left, the War in Iraq is going better since the “Surge”, and we might finally build another refinery so gas prices might fall.  So what isis that will attract people toObama. Well, the MSM will have a good showing and help Obama along, but the MSM is losing groundt the New Media,since people can look up what theMSM is saying and do not take their word for the truth anymore.

 

Today the WSJ has  got a good article on The Obama we don’t know:

Yet govern how and to what end? This is the Obama Americans don’t know. For all of his inspiring rhetoric about bipartisanship, his voting record is among the most partisan in the Senate. His policy agenda is conventionally liberal across the board – more so than Hillary Clinton’s, and more so than that of any Democratic nominee since 1968.

We can’t find a single issue on which Mr. Obama has broken with his party’s left-wing interest groups. Early on he gave a bow to merit pay for teachers, but that quickly sank beneath the waves of new money he wants to spend on the same broken public schools. He takes the Teamsters line against free trade, to the point of unilaterally rewriting Nafta. He wants to raise taxes even above the levels of the Clinton era, including a huge increase in the payroll tax. Perhaps now Mr. Obama will tack to the center, but somehow he will have to explain why the “change” he’s proposing isn’t merely more of the same, circa 1965.—WSJ

 

Cross Posted at Grizzly Groudswell and Stix Blog

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

Ed Morrissey wrote Time to return to the first principles of conservatism? several days ago. He makes a great point about the basics of conservatism.

What is the first principle of conservatism? Limited government. Our founders understood this, which is why they tightly constrained the jurisdiction of the federal government in the Constitution. Henry David Thoreau famously wrote “That government is best which governs least”, and that encapsulates what has been the overarching philosophy of conservatism as applied to governance. Furthermore, it exists in opposition to and as a counterbalance for the competing philosophy of socialism, which postulates that government improves as it governs more.

Sadly, limited government is probably the principle from which we’ve strayed the furthest. And the one we most need to reclaim.

Sphere: Related Content