<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Reclaim Conservatism</title>
	<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog</link>
	<description>Rebooting the GOP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Republicans Pull Off False Flag Operation in Massachusetts Special Election</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Boston &#8211; 1/16/10
Threnoddy B. Forbisher, Chairman of the small but politically influential Boston Republican Order of Wicked Neanderthals (BROWNs) acknowledged today to undercover operatives of GM&#8217;s Place that Martha Coakley was a plant.
Forbisher stated that the BROWN&#8217;s began to look for a plant in 2004 after Coakley stated that she would run for John Kerry&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2010/01/republicans-pull-off-false-flag-operation-in-massachusetts-special-election/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rubio Keynote Speaker at CPAC</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The story, and my thoughts, are at bRight &#038; Early.
My guess is that the crowd at CPAC is going to love this choice. He is extremely popular with party activist, going 12-0 in straw polls, winning most by huge margins.
Read the whole thing.



Share and Enjoy:


	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	


]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/rubio-keynote-speaker-at-cpac/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Your Turn</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to encourage comments and discussion this is your open post.
Note: We have threaded comments set up. You can reply directly to someone’s comment instead of having to reply down stream. You’ll see a link titled “Reply” beneath each comment. You can click on that to reply to the associated comment, or just fill [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/your-turn-4/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Aftermath</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night (Tues) was an interesting night for the Conservative Movement. For the most part it was a good night, with some setbacks. Last night the Conservatives won 2 out of 3 of the major elections the country was watching. The only loss was in NY 23, when Bill Owens beat Doug Hoffman for the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/aftermath/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Could It Be You?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t mentioned it in a while, but Reclaim Conservatism is looking for writers who would like to write on the topics of Conservatism, Conservative Values and Principles, and Reclaiming conservatism. It can be recurring or just an occasional, or even one time, post.
You can do this two ways. If you want to contribute on [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/could-it-be-you/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reflecting On Results</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at the results from yesterday&#8217;s elections I see different meaning in the different races we all were following. It&#8217;s almost as if people are individuals with differing outlooks and ideas of what is important. (Yes, that was sarcasm)
In New York City &#8212; Mayor Bloomberg won by a much narrower margin than the money he [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/reflecting-on-results/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Your Turn</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the overnight open thread at Reclaim Conservatism.
Note: We have threaded comments set up. You can reply directly to someone’s comment instead of having to reply down stream. You’ll see a link titled “Reply” beneath each comment. You can click on that to reply to the associated comment, or just fill in form at [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/your-turn-3/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>What does it mean?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the results we are about to see meaningful beyond the districts and states involved, or is the outcome essentially meaningless?
My gut says that the truth is somewhere between the extremes. At the core, however, I think that this will be a good day for conservatism and conservative values. Your thoughts? The comments are open.
UPDATE: [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/what-does-it-mean/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Your Turn</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant to post this at midnight last night. Oh well. 
In order to encourage comments and discussion this is your open post.
Note: We have threaded comments set up. You can reply directly to someone’s comment instead of having to reply down stream. You’ll see a link titled “Reply” beneath each comment. You can click [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/your-turn-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>NY-23</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s the race the political blogoshpere, cable and network news, and print sources are all talking about &#8212; New York&#8217;s special election in House district 23. If you tuned out Friday afternoon, you may have missed a few things.
On Friday, the day after the only three way debate, Hoffman continued to pick up endorsements from [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://reclaimconservatism.com/blog/2009/11/ny-23/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
