Philly precincts are kicking out Republican election Board members in violation of the law. This is just amazing.
Sphere: Related Content
A Repeat of 2004 Philly Voter Chaos, Fraud Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:46 AM EXCLUSIVE, DEVELOPING– GOP Election Board members have been tossed out of polling stations in at least half a dozen polling stations in Philadelphia because of their party status.
A Pennsylvania judge previously ruled that court-appointed poll watchers could be NOT removed from their boards by an on-site election judge, but that is exactly what is happening.
It is the duty of election board workers to monitor and guard the integrity of the voting process.
Denying access to the minority (in this case Republican) poll watchers and inspectors is a violation of Pennsylvania state law. Those who violate the law can be punished with a misdemeanor and subjected to a fine of $1,000 and sent to prison between one month and two years.—-Towhhall
McCain will suspend his campaign and will go back to the Senate and debate the bail out bill.
H/T to Leslie Carbone
FOX News is reporting that John McCain has realized that the Bush Administration’s outrageous plan to burden the taxpayers with a bail-out for irresponsible banks and borrowers cannot pass Congress. Sen McCain has requested a delay of this Friday’s presidential debate, plans to suspend his campaign tomorrow night and return to Washington for bail-out talks, and has challenged Barack Obama to do the same.
Here is McCain via Drudge
Sphere: Related ContentMCCAIN: America this week faces an historic crisis in our financial system. We must pass legislation to address this crisis. If we do not, credit will dry up, with devastating consequences for our economy. People will no longer be able to buy homes and their life savings will be at stake. Businesses will not have enough money to pay their employees. If we do not act, ever corner of our country will be impacted. We cannot allow this to happen.
Last Friday, I laid out my proposal and I have since discussed my priorities and concerns with the bill the Administration has put forward. Senator Obama has expressed his priorities and concerns.This morning, I met with a group of economic advisers to talk about the proposal on the table and the steps that we should take going forward.I have also spoken with members of Congress to hear their perspective.
It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support the Administration’ proposal. I do not believe that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we are running out of time.
Tomorrow morning, I will suspend my campaign and return to Washington after speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative. I have spoken to Senator Obama and informed him of my decision and have asked him to join me.
I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem.
We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved.I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night’s debate until we have taken action to address this crisis.
I am confident that before the markets open on Monday we can achieve consensus on legislation that will stabilize our financial markets, protect taxpayers and homeowners, and earn the confidence of the American people. All we must do to achieve this is temporarily set politics aside, and I am committed to doing so.
Following September 11th, our national leaders came together at a time of crisis. We must show that kind of patriotism now. Americans across our country lament the fact that partisan divisions in Washington have prevented us from addressing our national challenges. Now is our chance to come together to prove that Washington is once again capable of leading this country.
Developing…
Earlier General Wesley Clark, retired and former candidate for President made some remarks about who might be qualified for president. Of course, everybody knows that Clark was being a surrogate for Obama and Obama’s attempts to lessen the allure of John McCain’s military service since Obama has none. But Clark seems to have stepped over the line when he said “I don’t think getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president.” That raises an interesting question: What would Clark have said about the military and other exploits of other presidents?
Wesley Clark on George Washington: “I don’t think crossing the Delaware River standing up in a boat in the middle of winter qualifies Washington to be president.”
Wesley Clark on John Adams: “I don’t think being a diplomat in France and Holland during our bloody revolution qualifies Adams to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Thomas Jefferson: “I don’t think writing the Declaration of Independence qualifies Jefferson to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Abraham Lincoln: “I don’t think splitting logs in Illinois qualifies Lincoln to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Ulysses Grant: “I don’t think accepting Lee’s Sword at Appomattox qualifies Grant to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Teddy Roosevelt: “I don’t think riding up San Juan Hill with a bunch of washed out cowboys qualifies Roosevelt to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Franklin Roosevelt: “I don’t think getting polio and riding around in a wheel chair qualifies Roosevelt to be president.”
Wesley Clark on Ike Eisenhower: “I don’t think sitting on a battleship while our brave soldiers invaded Normandy qualifies Eisenhower to be president.”
Wesley Clark on John Kennedy: “I don’t think letting a Japanese Destroyer ram your PT boat, sinking it, qualifies Kennedy to be president.”
Clark seems to have thought that having no substantial experience qualifies Obama to be president, and certainly he thought that being the fired military commander of NATO qualified him to be president.
Cross posted at GM’s Corner
Sphere: Related ContentIn August of 1963, a muggy, sweltering day, a Senior at Mt. Vernon High School stood by the reflecting pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument. The student was only one of many many thousands that day, gathered in the hopes that some day there would be peace between white and black Americans. That student was me, and I was less than a month from my 17th Birthday.
As a 6th grader I witnessed the hostility and hatred of my fellow whites when Central High School in Little Rock was integrated. I cringed when called “nigger-lover” by some of my school mates who had never gone to school with blacks or ever associated with them or maybe even never knew one. You see, I grew up in the Army, my dad was a career officer and the Military had been integrated by President Truman in 1948. Integration was all I knew and I had no problems with it.
But, I digress, I stood with the thousands and listened to the tenor voice of Martin Luther King. As his voice rang out, this phrase in particular struck me, as it still does 45 years later:
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”
Judged by the content of their character. What a concept that is, when at the time, so many were judged by the color of their skin, the region they came from or the god that they worshiped, should not be judged by these things, but by their character.
And so we have arrived at today, having been through tumult, asassinations, riots and slow but positive growth, to a point where African Americans are elected by solid majorities to office in the south, where the bastions of hatred have been ground down, but unfortunately, where there are also those who would keep the races apart (Jessie, Al, are you reading this?) and those who depend on anger and hostility to keep their names in light.
We have had African Americans as Secretary of State, as Generals and Admirals, as Presidents of large Corporations, and now, a black American is running for President of the United States and it looks like he will get the nomination from the Democrat Party. Yet, in my opinion, the content of their character is still important.
Barack Obama proclaimed he would pull out of Iraq immediately, and now he says he won’t. He said that he would be using public financing for his race, and now he won’t. He has said that NAFTA was anathema, and now all of a sudden, it isn’t. He has attended a church where some of the most vile racist comments made from a pulpit have rung forth, and now he says that wasn’t the Jeremiah Wright he knew. He has associated with, and benefited from associations with an admitted but unconvicted urban terrorist. He has manipulated opposition off of the ballot in order to win elections. And he has said, in spite of no one making this association BUT him, that the opposition will play the race card.
The content of his character has been weighed.
And has been found wanting!
xposted at GM’s Corner
Sphere: Related ContentBreaking News:
(CNN) — Barack Obama resigned Saturday from his Chicago church — where controversial sermons by his former pastor and other ministers had created repeated political headaches for the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination, his campaign confirmed Saturday.
Gee, I wonder why? Do you suppose that the light shone on that little bastion of anger, angst, and acrimony might have had something to do with it? Nah, couldn’t be!
Sphere: Related Content
John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Empty suits, empty heads. Each has policies that are incompatable either with a free market or with a constitutional democracy, certainly this one. Yet, each has adherents that all but deify their choice for president, and many complain that Obama has indeed been deified into the “Obamessiah.”
And why not. We have gone from being a nation that prided itself on its ability to foster rugged individualism and strength of character, not as existed in fiction but in real life, to being a nation that gripes about any little hardship, where a parent hasn’t the guts to say no to a child lest they mess up that child’s psyche and a nation that sees nothing wrong with thier particular congressmen larding out pork merely to get re-elected. What is in it for me seems to be the catchword.
And the empty suits are promiseing everything from health insurance (under the false rubric of “health care crisis”). Too, pandering with governmental largesse has increased exponentially since Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” We have thrown trillions at “social” problems and today many/most of those problems are as bad today, if not indeed worse, than they were when we started tossing cash instead of really looking at the problem in terms of why aren’t some doing the very things that could help them.
In many ways, the victimization of America and Americans has brought this about. Being bullied? Institute a costly anti-bullying effort. Loose at tag? Easy, ban competitive games on the playground less some tyke’s feelings get hurt. Little Johnny can’t read? Fine, rather than teach Johnny phonics, start up a multi billion dollar reading certification program and guess what… spend all that money and now Johnny, and Susie and LaVonne, and La Tasha and Juan and Omar and Yin and Yung can’t read.
Recent reports that the government wastes money to the tune of 300 billion dollars a year. Now, I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t seem to be chump change to me. Thats a lot of bucks. But will anyone do anything about it? Nope, what we’ll get is Senators, Congressmen and aspirants to the throne telling us that they’ll cut waste if only we elect them. And the waste continues, and the beat goes on, and the beat goes on.
If conservatism is to survive, we must change from politicians in their empty suits promising the electorate everything from “a chicken in every pot” to relief from signing a bad mortage contract and the rest of us rescuing those too stupid to buy a house they can really afford.
Can this be done, you bet, and the answer lies in you, my fellow conservatives. We have to shame those in congress that spend like there is no tomorrow. Want an example? Mitch McConnel added a tax break for race horse owners that will amount to 126 million dollars over 10 years. Max Baucus got a million dollars for a sheep and goat industry improvement center.
Empty suit McCain promises to veto legislation with earmarks. Yet, like Obama’s health care for children and Hillary’s healthcare for everyone the details are not forth coming and the devil is in the details.
Shaming the government is no easy task. Those barely making it in today’s economy pay little or no income tax, Those making a huge amount of money find ways to avoid income tax. Fair tax and flat tax and all the other iterations of tax policy not withstanding, it ain’t gonna happen. How about this idea. Push for a law that states that everyone must mail in a check or money order each pay period containing their state and federal income taxes, their contribution to Social Security and any other taxes pro-rated to their pay schedule. Those that take home $1000.00 with federal withholding will like it far less when their check is for $1250.00 and they have to mail in a check or moneyorder every payday for $250.00. We used to all pay our own way, now we find ways to make it easier and the result is the empty suits promising us everything under the sun just to get elected. And we let them. In fact, we encourage them.
Obama has promised change. Yet, he doesn’t say how that change will improve things. McCain promises to save 100 billion in earmarks, then doesn’t have a plan that will do so nor do most folk find 100 billion in earmarks in any given tax year. Hillary promises leadership from day one. Yet, from day one she has run an inept campaign and want’s the nomination handed to her.
Empty suits. And if we buy it, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
Cross posted at GM’s Corner
Sphere: Related Content

Comment Analysis
Most Comments
Latest Comments
Latest Commented Posts
Most Commented Posts