John Hawkins examines a National Review piece by James Gimpel. Here is a bit of the flavor of Gimpel’s work:

A campaign doesn’t move toward them [centrist or moderate voters], but instead attempts to inspire them to come in the candidate’s direction. The incoherent center moves to the left or to the right, inspired by the candidate’s enthusiasm and the enthusiasm of his supporters. It is foolish for the candidate to move to the center, because the center is never a fixed position to move toward.

Moving centrists toward one’s candidacy is not a process that hinges on taking the right policy stands, either. Instead, it involves the enthusiasm and social contagion that builds around exciting candidates. We know from several volumes of political-science research that less-informed voters commonly substitute someone else’s judgment for their own. That someone else is often a spouse, workmate, or neighbor knowledgeable and enthusiastic about one of the candidates. Support for a candidate spreads through social influence processes.

I believe the case could be made that moving toward the center does nothing more than move the center. When either the left or right changes their focus those in the middle also shift so that they remain in the “center”. Conversely, moving toward your base could, I believe, move the center in your direction as well.

Here is Hawkin’s take as it relates to the Republican party:

The GOP no longer has the courage of their conservative principles and so, on many of their core principles, they offer up nothing but mush.

In other words, we’re a small government, cost cutting, law and order, party of the middle class and honest government that supports big government, ever increasing deficits, illegal immigration, tolerates corruption, and doesn’t offer much to the middle class.

People wonder why small government and cutting deficit spending doesn’t appear to be all that popular with the American people right now. Well, could it be because the same Republican politicians who are talking up “small government” have brought us large deficits, the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit, and are nationalizing our banks as part of a ridiculous, unnecessary bailout?

If the Republicans in Washington don’t even believe in their own party’s principles, is it any surprise that moderates don’t either?

No, it’s not.

Cross posted from bRight & Early

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

Anti-Iran Rally Turns Into Anti-Obama Rally

On September 22, 2008, in Uncategorized, by stix1972

Uh Oh.   It looks like the political stunt of not allowing Sarah Palin to the Anti-Iran rally backfired on Soros and those that pulled the plug on Palin coming to the event.   Are the Left just trying to throw this election???   Every time they do this kind of crap it will only push more and more people away from voting for Dems and Obama.   Pure PMS (Palin Madness Syndrome)

Anti-Iran Rally Turns Into Anti-Obama Rally

Jewish Groups Furious That Protest Against Ahmadinejad Was, At Times, A Pro-Palin, Bash-The-Dems Affair

Reporting
Marcia Kramer

NEW YORK (CBS) ― Politics and diplomacy were not a good mix at Monday’s protest rally against Iran at the United Nations.

Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin didn’t participate in the “Stop Iran Now” rally and there were a lot of hard feelings about it.

It was a simple sign that read “We Want Sarah. Shame On The Rally Organizer.”

Howard Webber from Brooklyn held it.

“As important an event as this is, you needed a unity of Democrats and Republicans to show Ahmadinejad that we’re not going to accept a nuclear Iran.”

Buddy Macy of Little Fells, N.J., felt much the same way.

“I’m so disappointed, upset,” Macy said. “She would have brought 10,000-20,000 more supporters of Israel. People who were curious were stopped because of partisan action.”

The brouhaha started after Clinton pulled out after she learned Palin was invited. Three organizations supporting the rally threatened to pull out unless Palin was disinvited. She was but organizers didn’t stop there.

They were furious Monday about the political signs brought by some at the rally, like an anti-Obama sign that said, “Jews Against Obama & Ahmadinejad.”

“I am upset by the sign because this is a non-political event,” said Janice Shorenstein, president of the Jewish Community Relations Council. “We are here today to cry out against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, not political. American elections are not part of this event.”—C-BS

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

The One is a Post-Partisan Candidate

On September 22, 2008, in Elections, by stix1972

And I am the Pope.   Obama came from Chicago and melded into the Chicago Machine.   He is a typical Chicago Politician, talks of Change And Hope, but offers none of it. He has voted with Democrats %96 of the time, and that is just when he decides he should go and actually do his job as a Senator of Illinois.

Rusty and the folks at the Jawa Report have done a great job of investigating a smear video on Youtube against Sarah Palin.   

Our research suggests that a subdivision of one of the largest public relations firms in the world most likely started and promulgated rumors about Sarah Palin that were known to be false. These rumors were spread in a surreptitious manner to avoid exposure.

It is also likely that the PR firm was paid by outside sources to run the smear campaign. While not conclusive, evidence suggests a link to the Barack Obama campaign. Namely:

  • Evidence suggests that a YouTube video with false claims about Palin was uploaded and promoted by members of a professional PR firm.
  • The family that runs the PR firm has extensive ties to the Democratic Party, the netroots, and are staunch Obama supporters.
  • Evidence suggests that the firm engaged in a concerted effort to distribute the video in such a way that it would appear to have gone viral on its own. Yet this effort took place on company time.
  • Evidence suggests that these distribution efforts included actions by at least one employee of the firm who is unconnected with the family running the company.
  • The voice-over artist used in this supposedly amateur video is a professional.
  • This same voice-over artist has worked extensively with David Axelrod’s firm, which has a history of engaging in phony grassroots efforts, otherwise known as “astroturfing.”
  • David Axelrod is Barack Obama’s chief media strategist.
  • The same voice-over artist has worked directly for the Barack Obama campaign.

Read the whole post.

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

The Content Of His Character

On June 22, 2008, in Uncategorized, by GM Roper

In August of 1963, a muggy, sweltering day, a Senior at Mt. Vernon High School stood by the reflecting pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument.  The student was only one of many many thousands that day, gathered in the hopes that some day there would be peace between white and black Americans.  That student was me, and I was less than a month from my 17th Birthday. 

As a 6th grader I witnessed the hostility and hatred of my fellow whites when Central High School in Little Rock was integrated.  I cringed when called “nigger-lover” by some of my school mates who had never gone to school with blacks or ever associated with them or maybe even never knew one.  You see, I grew up in the Army, my dad was a career officer and the Military had been integrated by President Truman in 1948.  Integration was all I knew and I had no problems with it.

But, I digress, I stood with the thousands and listened to the tenor voice of Martin Luther King.  As his voice rang out, this phrase in particular struck me, as it still does 45 years later:

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

Judged by the content of their character.  What a concept that is, when at the time, so many were judged by the color of their skin, the region they came from or the god that they worshiped, should not be judged by these things, but by their character.

And so we have arrived at today, having been through tumult, asassinations, riots and slow but positive growth, to a point where African Americans are elected by solid majorities to office in the south, where the bastions of hatred have been ground down, but unfortunately, where there are also those who would keep the races apart (Jessie, Al, are you reading this?) and those who depend on anger and hostility to keep their names in light.

We have had African Americans as Secretary of State, as Generals and Admirals, as Presidents of large Corporations, and now, a black American is running for President of the United States and it looks like he will get the nomination from the Democrat Party.  Yet, in my opinion, the content of their character is still important.

Barack Obama proclaimed he would pull out of Iraq immediately, and now he says he won’t.  He said that he would be using public financing for his race, and now he won’t.  He has said that NAFTA was anathema, and now all of a sudden, it isn’t.  He has attended a church where some of the most vile racist comments made from a pulpit have rung forth, and now he says that wasn’t the Jeremiah Wright he knew.  He has associated with, and benefited from associations with an admitted but unconvicted urban terrorist.  He has manipulated opposition off of the ballot in order to win elections.  And he has said, in spite of no one making this association BUT him, that the opposition will play the race card. 

The content of his character has been weighed.

And has been found wanting!

xposted at GM’s Corner

Sphere: Related Content

Tagged with:
 

John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.  Empty suits, empty heads.  Each has policies that are incompatable either with a free market or with a constitutional democracy, certainly this one. Yet, each has adherents that all but deify their choice for president, and many complain that Obama has indeed been deified into the “Obamessiah.”  

And why not.  We have gone from being a nation that prided itself on its ability to foster rugged individualism and strength of character, not as existed in fiction but in real life, to being a nation that gripes about any little hardship, where a parent hasn’t the guts to say no to a child lest they mess up that child’s psyche and a nation that sees nothing wrong with thier particular congressmen larding out pork merely to get re-elected.  What is in it for me seems to be the catchword.

And the empty suits are promiseing everything from health insurance (under the false rubric of “health care crisis”).  Too, pandering with governmental largesse has increased exponentially since Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.”  We have thrown trillions at “social” problems and today many/most of those problems are as bad today, if not indeed worse, than they were when we started tossing cash instead of really looking at the problem in terms of why aren’t some doing the very things that could help them.

In many ways, the victimization of America and Americans has brought this about.  Being bullied?  Institute a costly anti-bullying effort.  Loose at tag?  Easy, ban competitive games on the playground less some tyke’s feelings get hurt.  Little Johnny can’t read?  Fine, rather than teach Johnny phonics, start up a multi billion dollar reading certification program and guess what… spend all that money and now Johnny, and Susie and LaVonne, and La Tasha and Juan and Omar and Yin and Yung can’t read. 

Recent reports that the government wastes money to the tune of 300 billion dollars a year.  Now, I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t seem to be chump change to me.  Thats a lot of bucks.  But will anyone do anything about it?  Nope, what we’ll get is Senators, Congressmen and aspirants to the throne telling us that they’ll cut waste if only we elect them.  And the waste continues, and the beat goes on, and the beat goes on.

If conservatism is to survive, we must change from politicians in their empty suits promising the electorate everything from “a chicken in every pot” to relief from signing a bad mortage contract and the rest of us rescuing those too stupid to buy a house they can really afford. 

Can this be done, you bet, and the answer lies in you, my fellow conservatives.  We have to shame those in congress that spend like there is no tomorrow.  Want an example?  Mitch McConnel added a tax break for race horse owners that will amount to 126 million dollars over 10 years.  Max Baucus got a million dollars for a sheep and goat industry improvement center. 

Empty suit McCain promises to veto legislation with earmarks.  Yet, like Obama’s health care for children and Hillary’s healthcare for everyone the details are not forth coming and the devil is in the details.

Shaming the government is no easy task.  Those barely making it in today’s economy pay little or no income tax, Those making a huge amount of money find ways to avoid income tax.  Fair tax and flat tax and all the other iterations of tax policy not withstanding, it ain’t gonna happen.  How about this idea.  Push for a law that states that everyone must mail in a check or money order each pay period containing their state and federal income taxes, their contribution to Social Security and any other taxes pro-rated to their pay schedule.  Those that take home $1000.00 with federal withholding will like it far less when their check is for $1250.00 and they have to mail in a check or moneyorder every payday for $250.00.  We used to all pay our own way, now we find ways to make it easier and the result is the empty suits promising us everything under the sun just to get elected. And we let them.  In fact, we encourage them.

Obama has promised change. Yet, he doesn’t say how that change will improve things.  McCain promises to save 100 billion in earmarks, then doesn’t have a plan that will do so nor do most folk find 100 billion in earmarks in any given tax year.  Hillary promises leadership from day one.  Yet, from day one she has run an inept campaign and want’s the nomination handed to her.

Empty suits.  And if we buy it, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

 Cross posted at GM’s Corner

Sphere: Related Content

The Mainstream Media is trumpeting a massive defeat for the Republican Party. Of course, this is in part an attempt by the MSM to influence that outcome by setting up expectations. Adding to the predictions has been a lackadaisical performance by the Republicans. Did I say “lackadaisical?” change that to “unbelievably poor” performance by the Republicans.

Republicans were swept into power in 1994 on a platform of the Contract with America. A modest contract that promised reform:

  • FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress;
  • SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;
  • THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;
  • FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs;
  • FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;
  • SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public;
  • SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;
  • EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

So, how did they do. Well, congress is still privileged, waste and fraud run rampant and has been increased since the Democrats took back the reigns of power in ’06. In fact, the election of a majority of Liberal Democrats and their fellows has altered the process. The current House and House Leadership is rife with incompetence and self serving rules. In fact, it can be said that this is literally a “do nothing” congress.

Given the above I am convinced that conservatives must act, must act swiftly and must act strongly if they are to have any effect on the outcome of the coming election and on future elections.

Future elections I hear you say? What future if the Democrats win all three branches of government. And that is precisely the kind of rhetoric that has cost the conservative movement in the past and will continue to nail it in the future.

The problem, as I see it, is that we are playing with the Democrat’s rules. This has to stop if we are to have any chance at electing our own. We can’t run against diversity and multiculturalism, we have to run for merit and selection based on criteria blind to color and culture, religion and national origin. We can’t run against spending, we have to run for fiscal responsibility and the debt that our children will owe. We can’t run against surrender to the terrorists, we have to run for a strong military with a strong, forceful foreign policy that very clearly repeats Theodore Roosevelt’s dictum “Speak softly and carry a big stick.” Our enemies must know that we will not hesitate to use the stick when words fail. And we must get across to the world that we will have no patience with delay and deceit; Taqiyya be damned. If someone says they will do something, we will damn well expect it to be done without any unnecessary delay.

This stance of conservative principles has no chance in a strictly partisan environment with the populace seemingly leaning towards Democrats. But there is hope on the horizon, why not work to elect conservative Republicans AND Democrats? Conservatives don’t have to belong to a party, they can be independent, and should be… we are likely the largest single group of voters out there, when we get out and vote. Thus, if neither party can take us for granted, we can push for conservative nominee’s of both parties and get them elected. I suspect that if the majority of congress critters Congressmen and Senators don’t pay attention to us for two very major reasons. First, Democrats don’t pay attention to conservatives for the most part because they know we typically vote Republican. Secondly, Republicans don’t pay attention to conservatives for the most part because they know we typically vote Republican. That has to stop.

Many is the pundit that has observed that the black vote goes 90% to Democrats and the Democrats pay attention only at election time. More than one (pundit) has noted that if the Blacks withheld their vote, even once, than both Parties would scramble for the Black vote.

I propose not that we withhold our vote, but that we concentrate on finding solid conservative leaders regardless of which party and push like hell to get them elected. Only when both political parties realize that conservatism is a force to be reckoned with will we be again paid attention to.

And, if I need to say it, it is not our conservative values that have to be sold, those values are held by the majority of Americans. It’s not like we have to push unrealistic ideas such as crippling our economy to lower so called greenhouse gasses.

One or two election cycles with solid conservative leaders running should be enough to tip the scales. But this will require blood, sweat and tears. We have to sell the idea that our platform is the best for American interests. We have to push for more oil drilling and nuclear energy and jab a stick in the eyes of the OPEC nations. We have to show America how earmarks hurt them and how most current members of congress care about one thing and one thing only, getting their fat butts re-elected. We need tax reform such as perhaps ending withholding so that every body has to send a check to the IRS every payday. When people have to write their own checks every month the country will rise up against reckless earmarks and extravagant spending.

In short, we need a new way of looking at the the big picture. Are we Conservatives first, or are we Democrats and Republicans first and we’ll compromise on the rest. I suggest we Reclaim Conservatism from the Republican party and launch an all out political battle to elect true conservatives to office. Get them going after our vote and most of our troubles will be significantly reduced, or fade away.

Cross Posted @ GM’s Corner

Sphere: Related Content